Design decisions backed by evidence, not opinion. Datalabs runs research, wireframes, prototypes and design systems that are usability tested before a line of production code is written — so engineering builds the right thing once.
Each capability runs as its own workstream with a named owner. Open one to see how we scope, deliver and measure it.
Fewer wrong bets, from interviews, journey mapping and competitive teardowns that settle scope before build.
Faster sign-off, because stakeholders click the idea instead of imagining it.
Consistent products at speed, from design systems and component libraries that survive contact with engineering.
Interfaces that feel considered, with micro-interactions and transitions that guide rather than decorate.
Observed behaviour replacing internal opinion, through moderated and unmoderated testing rounds.
We map the current state, the data and the gap between them.
Scope, owners, sequencing and the number we are accountable for.
Work ships in increments you can review, not a big reveal.
Measure, iterate and reinvest into whatever is working.
Engagements are priced per client, as a monthly retainer or a fixed-scope sprint quoted up front. You always know the scope, the named owner and the number we are accountable for.
Question not covered here? Ask a senior specialist →
Design is quoted by scope after discovery, most often as a fixed-price phase covering research, wireframes, interface design and a component library. A defined design phase reduces build cost, because engineering time is far more expensive than revision time in Figma.
Research and journey mapping, then wireframes, then interface design against a component system, then a clickable prototype tested with real users before engineering starts. Each stage ends in a sign-off so scope is settled early rather than argued mid-build.
Yes — moderated and unmoderated rounds with five to eight participants per round, which reliably surfaces the majority of usability issues. Findings are logged as prioritised fixes with the recorded evidence attached.
Yes. Designs ship as token-based component libraries mapped to the front-end framework your team already uses, with states, spacing and accessibility rules documented so implementation does not rely on interpretation.
Yes — WCAG 2.2 AA contrast, focus states, keyboard operation and semantic structure are designed in and checked before handoff. Retrofitting accessibility after launch costs substantially more than designing for it.
Send one paragraph. You get a channel mix, scope, budget range and timeline back within 24 hours — from a senior specialist, not a salesperson.